It's been a while since I addressed the issue of woo. So let's start with ghosties and ghoulies.
First of all, let us get this dead right. There's no such thing. Ghosts do not exist. Disembodied spirits do not haunt anywhere. There is no such thing as a poltergeist, an evil spirit or anything like it. I repeat my generous offer - anyone who can show me a ghost or credible evidence of one (no, not a photo of an 'orb') will receive a shedload of dosh to their nominated charity. It's safe because it will never happen.
But there is no convincing those who throw science in the dustbin and are incapable of thinking something through. To them, ghosts or whatever are real, because they WANT them to be real. The greatest gift that god has given us (that was irony, by the way) is the gift of intelligence and the ability to reason. It is a sin not to use it. There is ALWAYS an explanation for the shadowy figure or the woman standing next to your bed when you wake up in the middle of the night. There is always a reason for the creaking floorboard. There is always a natural explanation for the weird noise heard in the small hours. By not thinking it through, the witness is guilty of reverting back to stone age mentality, when everything that was not immediately understood was asigned a supernatural explanation. These people are doing exactly the same thing.
So what is the harm? Probably very little in most cases, apart from the person themselves subjecting themselves to a life of fear, dread and superstition. Get on with it, if they want to live like that, super dooper. But the hidden side is the big business, the frauds and the idiots who try to convince impressionable and vulnerable people that there is something in this nonsense. When it comes to ghosties, well, most of the rather simple folk who pay to be scared out of their wits are welcome to it. Fools and money are easily parted, thats what I say. But belief in claptrap like this leads to belief in all things woo, and that when it gets to be dangerous. New age stupidity. Homeopathy, reiki, mediums, psychics, clairvoyants and other pond life all come creeping around, desperate to indoctrinate the feeble minded and take their cash, to the detriment in many cases of their families and loved ones.
So what about the catch phrases that alway surface as a defence to stupid beliefs? Eg. There are more things in heaven etc. OK, So what does that mean? It's a cliche. Yes, there are more things. Science discovers new things every day, so it does. But ghosts aren't on the agenda I'm afraid. Cliches dont win arguments and they certainly don't provide evidence for the existence of woo. When it is realised that there is actually NO evidence whatsoever for any of this crap, resorting to catch phrases is the standard procedure for reasons to believe.
So come on, all those people who claim to have proof positive of the existence of ghosties and ghoulies, share it and earn a Nobel prize. Or maybe Randi's million dollar award. But I'm not holding my breath.
:-)
You really are a waste of space - no nothing about life beyond the masons, such a sad twat. Enjoying life with the women acting as an old bag yourself.
ReplyDeleteDidnt take long, did it. An anonymous barrage of abuse from someone who cannot spell and stays up all night. But who believes in ghosties. I wonder if she has a cat....? Hang on, I'm getting something.....yes, sneezing, netto, stale lager, the scent of flowers.....
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it be nice if these abusive comments were done on a spellcheck and contained something that was relevant? But it's nice to know that someone is still checking me out after all this time. Gives me a warm glow it does. If the woo mongers still hate me but can only call me names, then it's job done I would say :-)
What a pity someone resorted to an abusive comment! Why weaken the argument of those who have had experiences of the 'paranormal' by stamping your foot and using bad language?
ReplyDelete"Paranormal is a general term (coined ca. 1915–1920) that designates experiences that lie outside "the range of normal experience or scientific explanation",Personally I would add to that ...scientific explanation...'as scientific knowledge stands at the moment'.
I would much rather debate the topic with a sceptic who pulls my theories apart, but does it politely..than with a 'believer ' who gets personal!
I still think Eldrick is too dismissive lol, I don't have any photographic evidence but I do have the word of those I know to be mentally stable,and honest ( and sober lol) and I have where possible always taken the sceptics view first.
regards to you Eldrick
Rambling Rose ( sending as Anon as I can't remember how to use the other options lol, but please use my name)
I dont doubt for one moment the utter sincerity and mental stability of many those who think they have had a supernatural experience. I do, however, question the general inability to consider any other explanation that may take it out of the realms of woo!
ReplyDeleteBut let us face it. If the thousands of people who claim to experience ghostly visitations are to be believed, then one would be entitled to imagine that there would be one - just one - tiny little bit of evidence available. Just one. But there isn't. There is, however, an alternative explanation for every single so called experience. SO one is left with the question - which is the more likely? A disembodied spirit roaming the earth for an eternity or a contraction of the floorboards due to a temperature decline? Obviously, the tortured soul in limbo would have been the winner until the church admitted that limbo doesnt really exist, which calls into question lots of other dogma but thats a discussion for another time :-)